Integrity Testing of a room takes about an hour and does not require the discharge of your gaseous suppression system

The biggest failure of suppression systems is the room's inability to "hold" the suppression gas

Testing the 'integrity' of a room is vital to ensure the protected area is well sealed and the gaseous extinguishing agent won't escpae.

Fire fighting systems designed and produced by Chubb Fire are renowned for their reliability. However, there is a factor which is beyond the control of Chubb engineers that is one of the most common causes for the failure of a system; the ‘integrity’ of the protected room, i.e. its capacity to hold gas.

To ensure the effectiveness of your gaseous fire suppression system, testing the ‘integrity’ of the room is vital to ensure your protected area is well sealed and your gaseous agent won’t escape, causing the fire to possibly re-ignite.

Environmentally friendly - no system discharge required

Prior to 1989 discharge testing was the only practical way to prove the ability of the protected room to hold the gas. Today, the environmentally friendly option of Integrity Testing is the accepted method. Both NFPA 2001 and British Standard ISO 14520 require an enclosure integrity test as part of the acceptable procedure for all clean agent systems.

Very little disruption

It causes very little disruption to the working day and the total expected running time of the test is approximately 1 hour.

Repeatable service

The service is repeatable, allowing the room to be tested at any time, for example, if any changes are to be made to the protected area. It is a requirement of BS ISO 14520 that a test is performed annually if it can not be verified that no changes have been made to the room since the previous test.

Does not interfere with extinguishing system

It is versatile. Neither the type of the gaseous fire fighting agent, nor the original provider of the extinguishing system inhibits the vital service.

Essential part of Halon system decommission

New clean agents have less tolerance for leakage than Halon systems. Halon protected rooms could lose over 50% of agent concentration before the fire could re-ignite. The new agents are more critical and can normally only lose about 20% before re-ignition. Therefore, what was an adequately sealed protected area for the use of Halon, would not be adequately sealed for the use of a new agent.

How it works

For any gaseous fire suppression installation to be effective, the design concentration must first be achieved, and then maintained at suitable levels within the risk. In order to achieve this the protected area must be adequately sealed around its boundary. Integrity Testing calculates the leak-tightness of a room and predicts how long it takes for the interface between the extinguishing agent and the air to descend to a given level.

The test equipment comprises of variable speed fans, expandable door panels, pressure gauges and a dedicated portable computer.

The door fan unit is fitted into a doorway of the protected area by means of the expandable door panels designed to fit most door frame sizes, and measures the size of holes in the enclosure and the pressures that may exit across them.

The fan speed is adjusted to obtain a steady pressure between the test area and the volume surrounding the test (equivalent to the column weight exerted by the extinguishing agent following a discharge). This pressure is then maintained whilst readings are taken from pressure gauges.

The measured rate of air input needed to maintain this pressure level is equivalent to the amount leaking from the test area. A second measurement is taken by doing the first test in reverse i.e. by depressuring the test area. The
two readings are averaged to reduce error.

The computer then converts the flow and pressure readings into an Equivalent Leakage Area, or the total area of all the cracks, gaps and holes in the test area. The data generated is then processed using specifically designed computer software, in compliance with the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) and the British Standard ISO 14520 which predicts the period of time that the concentration will be held in the test area at any given height. This retention time can be further calculated for different heights.

The computer software has also been designed to be conservative with its predictions. The software produces the worst case scenario in which 50% of the cracks, gaps in the test area are at a low level where heavier gas/air mixture will seep out and 50% are at a high level where lighter air will enter to displace it. This approach makes the results extremely reliable and means that any system which passes the room integrity test would have been virtually certain to pass a full discharge test.

Within an hour of the completed tests the computer produces a printout with full details of the input and test results, with a detailed report following in the post shortly afterwards. Failure is indicated if it takes less than ten minutes for the agent/air interface to drop below the minimum specified protected height.

However, if the test area does fail to satisfy the requirements, a detailed survey is carried out making a note of the leakage areas to allow remedial sealing works to be carried out.